Demo: Fresh Progress Complete
Solo Discovery
Stakeholder Enrichment
Build a brief someone else could act on
A-
Problem
B+
Outcomes
B+
Scope
C+
Resources
B
Stakeholders
B-
Risk
C+
Solution
B+
Business
Problem Clarity · A-
Data-backed problem with a clear trigger (July 1 Acme launch), specific cost of inaction quantified.
✓ No open action items
View in Details →
Outcome Definition · B+
Measurable success criteria: reduce onboarding from 14 days to 3, achieve 90% self-serve completion.
✓ No open action items
View in Details →
Scope Clarity · B+
Hard constraints confirmed, out-of-scope items named.
✓ No open action items
View in Details →
Resource Picture · C+
People identified, but Sarah's team availability at 50% is assumed, not confirmed.
1 action Confirm Sarah's team availability + leadership sign-off on migration trade-off
View in Details →
Stakeholder Alignment · B
4 stakeholders identified with clear roles. Positions assumed, not yet validated.
✓ No open action items
View in Details →
Risk Awareness · B-
Prior onboarding attempt identified as a risk, but the PM's account is secondhand.
1 action Confirm what happened with the contractor-built onboarding flow
View in Details →
Solution Readiness · C+
Intercom-based direction exists but based on a peer recommendation, not a technical evaluation.
1 action Vet Intercom feasibility with existing tech stack
View in Details →
Business Case · B+
Clear cost of inaction (20% churn = $180k ARR risk). $45k budget approved.
✓ No open action items
View in Details →
Your next move
Interview Sarah Chen
She was here for the original onboarding attempt and owns the team whose availability you need to confirm. Resolves 2 of your 3 open items.
Prepare Interview →

Action Items 6
Confirm what happened with the contractor-built onboarding flow

18 months ago a contractor built an onboarding flow that apparently didn't work out. Your account is secondhand — Sarah Chen was there and can give you the full picture. Understanding what went wrong will directly shape the solution approach.

Vet Intercom feasibility with existing tech stack

The Intercom recommendation came from a peer, not a technical evaluation. Mike Torres (CTO) needs to confirm it's compatible with your stack before you build a plan around it.

Confirm Sarah's team availability + migration trade-off

You're assuming Sarah's team can dedicate 50% capacity. That needs to be confirmed with her and with leadership, especially given the migration trade-off involved.

Interview Sarah Chen · Ops Lead

Sarah can fill in two major gaps — the prior onboarding attempt and her team's real availability. I've prepared targeted questions based on what's missing.

Interview questions preview

1. Walk me through what happened with the contractor-built onboarding flow. What specifically didn't work?

2. Realistically, how much of your team's time can we count on for this? What else are they committed to?

3. If we go with Intercom, does that create any issues with the tools your team already uses?

Interview Mike Torres · CTO

Mike is the technical decision-maker. He needs to weigh in on whether Intercom is viable before you commit to a solution direction.

Interview questions preview

1. Have you evaluated Intercom before? Any concerns about integrating it with our current stack?

2. Are there technical constraints or dependencies I should know about before we scope this?

Interview Jess Park · Acme Corp

Acme is your biggest incoming partner and the reason for the July 1 deadline. Understanding their expectations for the onboarding experience will strengthen your brief.

Interview questions preview

1. What does your team expect the onboarding experience to look like when you come on board?

2. How many users will you be onboarding initially, and over what timeframe?